About Me

Name: KGCowboy
Location: Glendale, AZ
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Health Care Cost and Health Care Savings Accounts

This is the third and final entry regarding my opinion on Health Care Obamanation.  

            Back in the good old days, when Mom took me to the Doctor she paid right there and then if she couldn’t afford to she made arrangements with the doctor to pay at a later date or to bring a chicken by, just kidding about the chicken. If a prescription was called for same story she paid, but if the prescription was too expensive she would have asked if there were a less expensive drug or an over the counter drug that might work. The point here is that Mom knew how much she was spending along the way. 

When we went to third party pay 3 things happened:

1)    The patient no longer knew how much a doctors visit, a test or a prescription cost.

2)    Doctors no longer new how much a test or a prescription cost. They didn’t even know if the insurance company would pay for the test or prescription.

3)    The doctors had a new office expense to add to the fees, they have to bill the insurance company.    

 

This caused an escalation in health care costs for the simple reason that the doctor and the patient no longer cared about the cost of tests or prescription, but the doctor had to roll his billing expenses into patient fees. This also had the affect of turning the Health Insurance Company into the bad guy because the doctor and the patient were not paying attention to the covered services and prescriptions. These are all un-intended consequences of the third party payer system. The proposal to implement a single payer system will do nothing to resolve these issues. I believe that it will exacerbate these issues by limiting the care a patient may receive. If a patient and their doctor define a course of treatment that is not allowed under single payer rules there is no way around it.   

The proposed solution is Health Care Savings Accounts (HCSA).  HCSAs allow a patient to save money in a special account tax free up to a set amount a year, let us say $2,000 for fun. Any funds that remain unused would remain accumulate in the account earning interest, a healthy 30 year old could accumulate $10,000 in 5 years, that is enough to cover the deductible on the catastrophic care policy. When patient is treated he can use a Special Debit Card that automatically generates a claim and deposits the funds directly into the providers account. In this case the patient/good consumer is using their own funds to pay for the treatment, and I think most of us with limited funds would ask the doctor questions like:

1)    Do I need this prescription or can I use a generic form.

2)    Do I really need that MRI or will an X-Ray or ultra sound provide the same information.

3)    Do I have to come back every 2 weeks for the blood test or can I come back every 4 weeks?

Does this a sound like we are asking people to be responsible, Heck Yea! But I think most people want to be responsible, they want to take an active role in their own health care.        

What about the poor you ask, well Government (you choose the level, local, state or federal) make available a health care debit card with a limited amount let say $2,000 per patient. Same story though, use it wisely when it is gone it is gone (of course that is not true Uncle Sam will make more money available on a case by case basis). When people understand that they have limited access, most will be more careful on how they use it. Limits can and need to be implemented generic drugs when available because  the patient is not spend their own money. 

The idea is to put health care management back in the hands of the patient and doctor, just like it was in the good old days…                 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Cost and Employee Based System!

 
This is the second of three entires regarding my opinion on Health Care Obamanation.  
    Old business first, my last entry received a very accurate comment regarding liability insurance and law suits, the comment contended that this was just a small part of  sky rocketing health care cost.  But, the unintended consequences of Professional Liability is that doctors over test and over prescribe to avoid professional liability.  When I broke my ankle in my 20's playing football all the doctor needed was an x-ray, today it would be an MRI.  That is just the beginning, don't get me started on blood tests.  The point is if doctors can get sued following accepted protocol than, they have go to the extra expense in every case.  This along with all of the other costs of professional liability is a significant factor in rise in Health Care costs.  
 
     Now for today's topic the employer based health care insurance.  There are so many issues with this I can't cover them all, I will cover the issues that strike me the most. 
    First you have to look at insurance, the insurance business is based on risk and understanding the frequency and cost of certain events.  If  in one year, one person in 100 has a heart attack and each heart attack cost $100,000 in medical expenses, the pool of required to pay for those expenses is $100,000.  The insurance company has over head (cost of providing service) and a right to make a profit, so lets say to cover heart attacks for 100 people for 1 year the insurance company needs to collect $110,000 or $1,100 per person in the plan.  Now consider all of the other illnesses and the average occurrence per 100 people and factor that in...
    Second issue company size, small, medium, large, super large.  Using the same example, a small company say 50 people, and there is one Heart Attack amongst that 50 people the insurance company has to be prepared to pay out $100,000 for that one heart attack there fore it must collect $2,200 per person.  These are just silly little examples, but is not hard to see how a small company can't really afford to provide health insurance coverage while a very large company can afford to cover their employees.  The problem we have is that most Americans are employed by small companies.  I think we understand the problem, but why are employers covering health care at all?
     Good question, well according to the IRS, companies can buy health care for their employees and as long as the coverage does not exceed the IRS formula, this coverage is tax free to the employee or a tax free employee benefit.  Why would a company want t do that?  Well that is the basis for a free market economy.  You might want to work for my company if I provide you better insurance coverage for you and your family.  If my competitor offers you a better compensation package including health insurance you my prefer to sell your services to the highest bidder.  Well that is how it all started, now of course health care coverage from your employer is seen as a right.    
     There is another way, give the tax credit to the individual and let them buy the coverage they want.  I am a Realtor, I have a catistrophic care for me and my wife, the deductible is $5,000 per person.  Through the same insurance company for a small fee I joined a network, all of the providers in the network have agreed to charge lower than prevailing rates because the people in the network are paying cash or check for the service.  The health care providers can do this because they don't have to staff for insurance billing or wait for their fees.  The insurance company keeps the rates down because they aren't covering the everyday bumps, bruses and colds.
     What about the poor people, well I am not rich by any means.  If they are qualified as needing assistance pay the tax credit directly to the chosen insurer, issue a special credit card (like the food stamp program) where the provider is paid directly.  Obviously, only qualified providers could accept the card for payment.  My concern is that if somebody does not pay for something themselves they just don't appreciate it and are likely to abuse it. 
     We can sort out the details later, but we don't need to dismantle and remake Health Care and Health Care Insurance  into Health Care Obamanation!!!      
                       
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care Cost and Tort Reform!

     Law Suits are one of three major issues that drive health care costs.  Most professionals carry Professional Liability Insurance to manage the risk of law Suits.  Professional Liability is the highest among the Health Care Professions.  If a Doctor has to pay $50,000 a year in professional liability insurance they have to pass that on to their patients.  Almost all professional liability insurance policies have a deductible, just like your copay, just like you that comes out of the Doctors pocket first.  The deductibles start at $5,000 and go up from there.  Ch-ching add that to the patients bill can you see where this is going.  Law suits are always aimed at the deep pockets, and are rarely about the facts and more about how much the insurance/Doctor/hospital.  All these cost are eventually passed on to the patient.          
     When a doctor follows a well established protocol for a given set of symptoms, why should the doctor be subject to a law suit?  If somebody decides to bring a suit against a doctor it should be referred to a panel of doctors for review.  If the doctor deviated from the protocol, and this deviation caused injury to the patient , then by all means proceed.  If the doctor follows the protocol there should be and the patient is injured the doctor should not be subject to suit.  If a patient withholds or distorts symptoms, and the doctor relays upon the patient, the doctor should not be subject to suit.  If a doctor panel rules that a doctor followed protocol based on know symptoms and conditions a suit should not be forwarded to civil court.
     Tort Reform should also include caps based on a formula not based on how much the insurance company/ Doctor / hospital can pay.  This would allow predictable out comes and normalize Professional Liability Insurance.  Tort Reform can still allow for gross negligence, which is probably the one area that we all agree the Health Care Provider should be held fully responsible.   
             
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reflections on Ted Kennedy's Passing

     The passing of Ted Kennedy reminds me of the death of his older brother John Kennedy, primarily because it is one of my earliest memories.  I was staying with My Aunt Donna, Uncle Ricardo and Cousins Ricardo (Rickey) and Robert in Mexicali Mexico.  Rickey and I were going to preschool while Robert was just starting to walk.  The news came out over the radio, Kennedy had been shot, and that the borders were being closed.  The adults began to scramble, they couldn't find enough suit cases for every bodies clothes.  Rickey and were had to put our clothes into pillow cases, of course they were stuffed full, we didn't know how long the border would be closed.  We were all packed and ready to go, we drove to the border crossing, but they would not let Uncle Ricardo through because he was a Mexican citizen.  Aunt Donna and us kids piled out of the car and crossed the border on foot, Robert was being carried by Aunt Donna and Rickey and I were dragging the overstuffed pillow cases behind us.  It was definitely a of 2 refugees struggling to get over the border.  We took a bus back back to our home town of Indio, California. 
      I don't recall ever sharing a political position with Ted Kennedy, but I do recall that his brother John and the wisdom to cut taxes, boosting the U.S. economy.  It must be a liberal thing to use a fallen politician to boost the latest liberal cause.  I think attaching his name to the current "Health Care Obamanation" will stain Ted Kennedy's memory.  After all, he was the Lion of the Senate, he authored and co-authored a great deal of legislation.  What ever you may think of Edward Kennedy above all he served his country... 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »